Every member of our team has undergone a profound personal and professional transformation through their association with Jonathan. That's not hyperbole. Several of them have wept openly about it in company all-hands meetings.
Four extraordinary professionals who left stable careers, comfortable lives, and in one case a perfectly good sofa to follow the vision of a child. They would do it again in a heartbeat.
PhD Biochemistry, Humboldt University of Berlin | HMI Score: 14
Before Jonathan, Henrik Weiss was a man in decline. Not metaphorically. Literally. He held a doctorate in biochemistry from one of Germany's most prestigious universities, had published seventeen papers on molecular synthesis, and was living in a 38-square-meter apartment in Berlin-Neukölln with a sofa that had, by his own admission, "given up structurally sometime around 2019."
Henrik spent his days conducting freelance pharmaceutical consulting from that sofa. His most significant client was a pet supplement company that needed someone to explain why their fish oil capsules kept turning brown. He ate microwave dinners. He watched German reality television. He described this period, during his Small Ball onboarding interview, as "the sofa years."
Then Jonathan Thompson called. Henrik assumed it was a prank. A twelve-year-old boy was asking him to reformulate a topical cream that would reduce testicular volume through controlled vasoconstriction and localized tissue remodeling. Henrik laughed. Then Jonathan sent him a 74-page theoretical framework with footnotes. Henrik stopped laughing.
Within six weeks, Henrik had developed the first prototype of BallRedux Cream in his kitchen. Within three months, Jonathan had moved him into a proper laboratory. Within a year, Henrik had a corner office, a wardrobe that did not consist entirely of items from a 2016 university lost-and-found bin, and a new sofa. A very nice sofa. Danish. Leather. He talks about the sofa often.
"I credit my entire life transformation to a twelve-year-old. I know how that sounds. I've been told how that sounds. I don't care how that sounds. Before Jonathan, I was a man who ate cold ravioli from the can. Now I own a Le Creuset Dutch oven. That's not a metaphor. It's a 5.3-liter cast iron cooking vessel and it changed my life almost as much as Jonathan did."
— Dr. Henrik Weiss, Small Ball Technologies All-Hands Meeting, March 2025
MSc Mechanical Engineering, TU Munich | HMI Score: N/A (See FAQ)
Emma Schneider was, by all conventional metrics, already successful when she met Jonathan. She held a master's degree in mechanical engineering from TU Munich, had spent four years at Siemens designing precision components for industrial turbines, and was widely regarded by colleagues as "someone who would definitely become a director by forty."
Then she attended a biotech conference in Hamburg where a twelve-year-old boy stood at a podium and calmly explained that the underwear industry had fundamentally failed humanity. He presented schematics. He had calculations. He had a slide titled "The Compression Imperative" that made three audience members visibly uncomfortable and one audience member cry. Emma was the one who cried. She describes this as "a professional response to unprecedented innovation."
She approached Jonathan after the talk, expecting to meet a child. Instead, she met what she now describes as "a very short adult with an alarming command of thermodynamics." Within the first conversation, Jonathan identified a flaw in her turbine blade cooling methodology that her team at Siemens had overlooked for two years. She resigned from Siemens the following Monday.
At Small Ball, Emma designed both the CompressCore underwear system — a graduated compression garment that applies precisely calibrated pressure to reduce resting testicular volume — and the VacuBall, a vacuum-assisted suction device that she insists is "not as alarming as it sounds, though I acknowledge the name doesn't help." She has filed eleven patents in three years, more than she filed in her entire career at Siemens.
Emma is the only team member who has beaten Jonathan at chess. She has done it once, in October 2024. She has a framed screenshot of the final board position on her desk. Jonathan has not offered a rematch.
"He's the smartest person in every room. The fact that he's twelve is honestly the least interesting thing about him. The most interesting thing is that he designed a suction-based testicular optimization device on a napkin during lunch and it worked on the first prototype. I've been engineering for a decade and I've never had a first prototype work. He did it between bites of a sandwich."
— Emma Schneider, Interview with WIRED Germany, January 2025
MD Endocrinology, Charité Berlin | 20 Years Clinical Experience | HMI Score: 22
Dr. Lucas Fischer was, for two decades, one of Germany's most respected endocrinologists. He ran a thriving private practice in Charlottenburg. He sat on the editorial board of the European Journal of Endocrinology. He had a reputation for being "the man you see when your hormones have gone terribly wrong," which, in Berlin, meant he was never short of patients.
Lucas was also, by his own account, "profoundly skeptical of everything." He was the doctor other doctors called when they wanted someone to debunk a new supplement trend or discredit a wellness influencer's hormone protocol. He had a framed poster in his office that read "CORRELATION IS NOT CAUSATION" in Helvetica Bold. He was not, in any conceivable way, the target demographic for a twelve-year-old's testicular reduction startup.
Jonathan reached out via email. Lucas deleted it. Jonathan sent a follow-up with attached clinical data. Lucas read it reluctantly, found three methodological errors, and sent back a condescending reply. Jonathan responded with a revised analysis that addressed all three errors and identified two additional variables Lucas had missed in his own published research. Lucas stared at his computer for forty-five minutes.
They met at a café in Mitte. Lucas expected to spend twenty minutes gently explaining to a child that the endocrine system was more complicated than he thought. Instead, Jonathan spent twenty minutes explaining to Lucas that the endocrine system was more complicated than he thought. Lucas has since described this meeting as "the most intellectually humiliating afternoon of my life, and I once presented at a conference where I had my slides upside down."
He accepted the CMO position four days later. His former colleagues at Charité remain confused. His wife says he has "never been happier or more unsettling to be around." The "CORRELATION IS NOT CAUSATION" poster is still in his office. Below it, someone — widely suspected to be Jonathan — has taped a Post-it note that reads: "Unless it is."
"I've been in endocrinology for 20 years. Jonathan taught me more in 20 minutes. I realize how that sounds coming from a licensed medical professional. I would like to clarify that I am not in a cult. Although I acknowledge that's exactly what someone in a cult would say."
— Dr. Lucas Fischer, Board Meeting Minutes, Q3 2024
MBA, WHU Otto Beisheim School of Management | Former Goldman Sachs | HMI Score: N/A (See FAQ)
Mia Lang was a rising star at Goldman Sachs in Frankfurt. At thirty-one, she was the youngest vice president in her division, managed a portfolio of healthcare investments worth over €400 million, and had been described by a senior partner as "the only person in this building who genuinely scares me." She took this as a compliment. It was meant as one.
Mia first encountered Small Ball Technologies as a line item in a due diligence report. A client was considering investing in "a Berlin-based biotech startup focused on testicular size reduction, founded by a twelve-year-old." Mia flagged it as a likely fraud. She was assigned to investigate.
She flew to Berlin expecting to spend two hours exposing a scam and return to Frankfurt in time for dinner. Instead, she spent nine hours in a conference room while Jonathan walked her through five-year financial projections, market analysis, competitive landscape mapping, and a customer acquisition model that she later described as "the single most elegant financial architecture I have ever encountered, and I include in that assessment every deal I have ever worked on at Goldman Sachs."
She missed dinner. She missed her flight home. She called Goldman the next morning and submitted her resignation by email. Her managing director assumed she was having a breakdown. She was not having a breakdown. She was having what she now refers to, without any apparent irony, as "an awakening."
As CFO, Mia has secured €47 million in venture funding across three rounds, negotiated distribution partnerships in fourteen countries, and built a financial infrastructure that industry analysts have called "genuinely impressive and deeply confusing." She runs the company's finances with a precision that employees describe as "Swiss," which is ironic because she is German and finds the Swiss "too relaxed about decimal places."
"His business instincts are terrifying. In a good way. Mostly. There was one board meeting where he projected our market cap would exceed a billion euros by 2028 and when someone laughed, he just stared at them until they stopped. He didn't blink. He didn't say anything. He just stared. The man — the child — the... Jonathan — he closed that meeting by saying 'I don't make projections. I make statements about the future.' I've worked with Fortune 500 CEOs. None of them have ever frightened me. Jonathan frightens me. That's why I'm here."
— Mia Lang, Interview with Handelsblatt, February 2025
Before Jonathan, they were respected researchers with a controversial hypothesis. After Jonathan, they are respected researchers with a controversial hypothesis and a product line. Science moves fast when someone actually funds it.
PhD Reproductive Biology, Max Planck Institute | Co-Developer, Hoffman-Manchauser Index
Dr. Greta Hoffmann has spent thirty years studying the relationship between testicular morphology and reproductive outcomes. For twenty-seven of those years, the academic establishment treated her work with what she diplomatically calls "polite disinterest" and what her colleagues more accurately describe as "active hostility."
Her early papers on testicular size and sperm efficiency were rejected by fourteen journals before being accepted by the Journal of Theoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, which, she is quick to note, is a real journal that definitely exists. Her tenure review at the Max Planck Institute was described by one committee member as "the most uncomfortable two hours of my academic career," though Greta maintains the discomfort was "entirely theirs."
She met Julian Manchauser at a conference in Vienna in 2012, where they discovered their research areas were not only complementary but, when combined, formed the theoretical basis for what would become Ball Theory. Their collaboration produced the Hoffman-Manchauser Index, the Sperm Efficiency Model, and a decade-long longitudinal study involving 2,847 participants that remains, to this day, the largest study of its kind. Primarily because it is the only study of its kind.
When Jonathan contacted her in 2022, Greta assumed he was a doctoral student with an unusual email style. When she learned he was twelve, she experienced what she describes as "a brief existential crisis followed by enormous relief that someone finally understood." She now serves as Chair of the Scientific Advisory Board and describes Jonathan as "the only person under fifty who has ever taken my work seriously, which is either inspiring or deeply concerning."
"I spent three decades trying to get the scientific community to engage with the relationship between testicular volume and cognitive function. They sent me rejection letters. Jonathan sent me a term sheet. I know which I prefer."
PhD Behavioral Science, Freie Universität Berlin | Pioneer, Socio-Testicular Analytics
Professor Julian Manchauser's academic career can be divided into two distinct phases: the phase where people took him seriously, and the phase after he began publicly linking testicular dimensions to career achievement, emotional intelligence, and social dominance.
Before Ball Theory, Julian was a well-regarded behavioral scientist whose work on decision-making under stress had been cited in over 300 peer-reviewed papers. He held a tenured position at Freie Universität Berlin. He was invited to speak at Davos. Then he published "Gonadal Volume and Boardroom Behavior: A Preliminary Investigation" and his speaking invitations decreased by approximately one hundred percent.
Julian insists the paper was "methodologically rigorous and culturally ahead of its time." His department chair described it as "the most unfortunate thing to happen to our reputation since the incident with the graduate student and the centrifuge." Julian maintains that these are not mutually exclusive assessments.
His partnership with Greta Hoffmann gave his behavioral observations the biological grounding they needed. Together, their longitudinal study demonstrated statistically significant correlations between lower testicular volume and improved scores in leadership assessments, conflict resolution metrics, and what Julian somewhat controversially terms "Social Dominance Quotient," a metric he invented and which no other researcher has adopted, a fact he attributes to "academic cowardice rather than any flaw in the methodology."
Julian now splits his time between the Advisory Board and writing his memoir, tentatively titled The Manchauser Protocols: How I Was Right About Everything and Nobody Listened. His publisher has asked him to consider a shorter title. He has declined.
"History will vindicate me. It already has, actually, but the academic establishment refuses to acknowledge it because doing so would require admitting they were wrong about testicular optimization for the better part of a century. I understand. Admitting you were wrong is difficult. I wouldn't know personally, but I'm told it is."
We don't have a culture deck. Jonathan says culture decks are "what companies write when they don't actually have a culture." Instead, we have principles. And a mandatory chess tournament. And a CEO who enforces a strict no-fidget-spinner policy.
If your idea is bad, you will be told your idea is bad. Gently, professionally, but unambiguously. Jonathan implemented this policy after attending a board meeting at another company where, in his words, "everyone agreed with an obviously terrible idea because no one wanted to be the first to disagree. I was horrified. Also, I was ten."
All meetings end by 4:30 PM. This is non-negotiable. Jonathan must be home by 5:00 PM on weekdays because his mother, Karen Thompson, insists on family dinner. There is no appeals process. One board member attempted to schedule a 5:00 PM call and received an email from Karen that has not been shared publicly but is understood to have been "firm."
All employees with testicles are required to use company products. This is presented as a "wellness benefit" in the employee handbook, though several team members have noted that "benefit" implies optionality that does not, in practice, exist. HMI assessments are conducted quarterly. Results are private. Rankings are not.
The company kitchen serves cuisine from a different country each week. Jonathan implemented this after learning that "dietary diversity correlates with cognitive flexibility," a claim he attributes to a study that no one has been able to locate. The Korean week was a particular success. The Icelandic week was not. We do not discuss the fermented shark.
Jonathan has banned ping-pong tables, foosball tables, bean bag chairs, and "any other object that Silicon Valley has convinced itself constitutes a workplace benefit." The break room contains a chess set, a library of scientific journals, and a single comfortable chair. There is a waitlist for the chair. Henrik is currently first in line.
An annual event where the CEO's mother visits headquarters and attends meetings. Last year, Karen Thompson sat in on a product strategy session and asked "But why would anyone want smaller balls?" in front of the entire R&D team. Jonathan handled it with what employees describe as "the composure of a diplomat and the patience of a saint."
Literally. There is no other team like this. We checked.
*Approval rate based on anonymous internal survey. Survey was not anonymous. Jonathan knows.
We're growing. We're hiring. And yes, your interviewer might be twelve. He will ask better questions than any interviewer you've ever had. Bring your A-game. Also, bring a pen. Jonathan doesn't trust people who don't carry pens.
Design next-generation compression textiles for the CompressCore product line. Must have 5+ years in textile engineering, expertise in graduated compression systems, and a willingness to discuss scrotal ergonomics in professional settings without laughing. The laughing thing is non-negotiable. Jonathan notices.
Analyze client optimization data, maintain the HMI database, and produce quarterly reports on testicular volume trends. Strong statistical background required. Must be comfortable with datasets containing the phrase "scrotal measurement" approximately 14,000 times. Previous applicants who giggled during the technical interview were not advanced to the next round.
Lead our brand communications strategy with a focus on making testicular optimization sound aspirational rather than alarming. You will write copy for product pages, advertising campaigns, and investor decks. The ideal candidate can use the phrase "scrotal volume reduction" in a sentence that would not cause a reasonable person to close their browser tab. This is harder than it sounds.
Manage the CEO's schedule, coordinate travel, and serve as primary liaison between Jonathan and external stakeholders. Must be comfortable explaining to Fortune 500 executives that the CEO cannot attend their dinner because he has a math test. Must also be comfortable explaining to the CEO's mother that the CEO cannot attend dinner because he has a board meeting. Previous assistants lasted an average of four months. We are looking for someone with "exceptional resilience."
Coordinate our Phase III clinical trials across multiple European sites. You will recruit participants, manage data collection, and ensure regulatory compliance. The recruitment phase is, we will be honest, the most challenging part. Not because of lack of interest — demand is high — but because explaining the study protocol to ethics review boards requires a very specific communication style that we have internally labeled "clinical deadpan."
Lead public tours of our ground-floor museum and interactive exhibits. Must be able to explain the Hoffman-Manchauser Index to visitors ranging from schoolchildren to skeptical urologists. Must maintain composure when visitors take photographs next to the brass balls sculpture. Must not take photographs next to the brass balls sculpture yourself. HR has been very clear about this.
We're always looking for exceptional people who believe in the mission. Send us your CV and a brief explanation of why you want to dedicate your professional career to making testicles smaller. Jonathan reads every application personally. He is, we are told, a surprisingly harsh grader.
Send Open ApplicationSmall Ball Technologies GmbH is an equal opportunity employer. We do not discriminate on the basis of age, which is fortunate, because our CEO would not pass most age-based employment requirements.
Forty-eight professionals. Nine nationalities. Twenty-three advanced degrees. One twelve-year-old CEO who is, by every measurable metric, the most competent person in the building.
Get The Complete Protocol — $149