A comprehensive exploration of the groundbreaking hypothesis linking testicular volume reduction to cognitive enhancement, reproductive efficiency, and measurable life success.
*PEER REVIEW PENDING. STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE CALCULATED USING PROPRIETARY METHODOLOGY. SEE SECTION 7, APPENDIX C.
A groundbreaking hypothesis in reproductive biology, endocrinology, and socio-behavioral science that is reshaping how we understand the relationship between gonadal dimensions and human potential.
Ball Theory posits a direct, measurable correlation between testicular volume and three critical life domains: reproductive potency, cognitive function, and overall life success. The hypothesis, first articulated by Dr. Greta Hoffmann in her seminal 2018 paper "Inverse Gonadal Scaling and Its Implications for Homo sapiens Cognitive Throughput," states that smaller testicles produce more concentrated, efficient spermatozoa, leading to higher fertility rates while simultaneously conserving metabolic energy that is redirected to prefrontal cortex activation, emotional regulation, and strategic decision-making.
In essence, the body's finite metabolic energy budget is being squandered on unnecessary testicular mass. The average adult male testicle weighs approximately 25 grams and consumes an estimated 4.2% of resting metabolic expenditure on thermoregulation, spermatogenesis overhead, and structural maintenance alone. By optimizing testicular dimensions, we free up this energy for higher-order cognitive functions. Think of it as upgrading from a gas-guzzling SUV to a precision-engineered electric vehicle -- same destination, radically better efficiency.
Ball Theory does not merely hypothesize. It quantifies. Through the Hoffman-Manchauser Index (HMI), the Testicular Efficiency Quotient (TEQ), and the Gonadal Metabolic Redistribution Model (GMRM), researchers can now predict with startling accuracy how a given reduction in testicular volume will translate to measurable gains in IQ points, emotional stability, annual income, and even romantic partner satisfaction ratings.
ΔCognitive Function = (Energy Conserved via Testicular Optimization) × (Hoffman-Manchauser Coefficient) + Baseline IQ
Where:
• Energy Conserved = Baseline Testicular Metabolic Load − Post-Optimization Metabolic Load (measured in kcal/day)
• Hoffman-Manchauser Coefficient = Individual neuro-endocrine conversion efficiency (range: 0.47 – 2.31)
• Baseline IQ = Pre-optimization cognitive score (Stanford-Binet V)
Reduction in gonadal mass frees metabolic resources for neural development and cognitive processing.
Smaller production facilities yield higher-quality, more motile spermatozoa with superior DNA integrity scores.
Optimized gonads produce steadier testosterone output, eliminating spikes that cause aggression and poor decisions.
Ball Theory proposes that human testicular size has been on a suboptimal evolutionary trajectory since the late Pleistocene. While our ancestors required large gonads for sperm competition in multi-male mating systems, modern monogamous social structures render this excess capacity wasteful.
The theory suggests we are, in effect, carrying evolutionary baggage in our pants -- metabolically expensive organs calibrated for a mating strategy we abandoned approximately 12,000 years ago.
Hippocrates notes in On Airs, Waters, and Places that Scythian eunuchs "possessed remarkable clarity of thought." Though misattributed to castration, Ball Theory researchers now believe Hippocrates was observing the earliest evidence of gonadal optimization in a pre-industrial population.
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek first observes spermatozoa under magnification. His private diaries, recently discovered in a Delft attic, contain the cryptic note: "The smallest vessels yield the finest brew." Ball Theory scholars consider this a prophetic statement.
In a lesser-known appendix to On the Origin of Species, Darwin reportedly commented on the inverse relationship between gonadal size and behavioral sophistication across primate species. The appendix was suppressed by Victorian-era editors who found it "indelicate."
Professor emeritus Helmut Krenzer presents a paper at the Munich Conference on Reproductive Morphology titled "Über die umgekehrte Beziehung zwischen Hodengröße und kognitiver Leistung" (On the Inverse Relationship Between Testicular Size and Cognitive Performance). He is laughed out of the conference. He dies in 1991, vindicated only posthumously.
Dr. Greta Hoffmann and Prof. Julian Manchauser launch the landmark 10-year study at Humboldt University, Berlin. Initial enrollment: 2,847 participants across 14 countries. The largest gonadal optimization study in human history begins with a simple measurement: a pair of calipers and a dream.
Hoffmann publishes the foundational paper in the Journal of Theoretical Biology and Bioinformatics. The paper goes viral in reproductive biology circles. Downloads crash the journal's server -- a first in the publication's 40-year history.
12-year-old Jonathan Thompson, after reading the Hoffmann-Manchauser paper during a "boring afternoon," founds Small Ball Technologies GmbH in Berlin. "I just thought someone should actually do something about this," he tells der Spiegel.
The 10-year study concludes with what Hoffmann calls "results that will fundamentally alter reproductive medicine." Full dataset published. Critics remain skeptical. Hoffmann remains unbothered.
Small Ball Technologies surpasses 14,000 active protocol users. The Biohacker Challenge is issued. The world begins to take notice. You are here.
Ball Theory identifies a previously unknown neuro-gonadal feedback loop: the Brain-Ball Axis (BBA). As testicular mass decreases, prefrontal cortex blood flow increases by up to 7.3%. The brain, freed from managing unnecessary scrotal infrastructure, reallocates resources to executive function, creativity, and the ability to parallel park.
The human body operates on approximately 2,000-2,500 kcal/day. The Gonadal Metabolic Redistribution Model (GMRM) demonstrates that testicular optimization frees an average of 84-127 kcal/day -- equivalent to the metabolic cost of learning a new language or solving 47 additional Sudoku puzzles per week.
Just as espresso is superior to drip coffee because it concentrates flavor into a smaller volume, optimized testicles produce what Manchauser calls "espresso sperm" -- fewer in quantity but dramatically superior in motility, morphology, and DNA integrity. Quality over quantity. Always.
The gold standard for quantifying testicular efficiency. A composite metric that synthesizes dimensional, functional, and metabolic data into a single, actionable score.
The Hoffman-Manchauser Index is calculated using a proprietary algorithm that integrates seven distinct biometric inputs: testicular volume (mL), scrotal thermal gradient (degrees C), spermatozoa concentration per mL, mean sperm motility velocity (um/s), serum testosterone stability coefficient, gonadal metabolic rate (kcal/day), and the subject's self-reported "sense of general well-being" on a 1-10 Likert scale.
The resulting score ranges from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate superior testicular efficiency. Unlike other biometric indices, the HMI is inversely correlated with desirable outcomes -- a deliberate design choice by Hoffmann and Manchauser to maintain consistency with the core Ball Theory paradigm that smaller is better.
HMI = (Vt × 0.28) + (ΔTs × 0.15) + (1/Csp × 0.18) + (1/Mv × 0.12) + (σT × 0.14) + (Gmr × 0.08) + ((10 − Wb) × 0.05)
Vt=testicular vol. | ΔTs=thermal gradient | Csp=sperm concentration | Mv=motility velocity | σT=testosterone stability | Gmr=gonadal metabolic rate | Wb=well-being score
Elite cognitive performers. Estimated <2% of global male population. Associated with Nobel laureate-tier IQ scores, Fortune 500 leadership, and the ability to remember where they put their keys.
Above-average performers. Strong cognitive gains, stable hormone profiles, excellent sperm quality. Typically entrepreneurs, researchers, and people who finish books they start.
The majority of unoptimized males fall here. Adequate but unremarkable performance across all metrics. Characterized by moderate decision-making quality and an inexplicable attachment to cargo shorts.
Significant metabolic waste detected. Elevated testosterone volatility. Subjects in this range demonstrate impulsive behavior, difficulty with long-term planning, and a statistically higher likelihood of purchasing cryptocurrency at all-time highs.
Critical metabolic inefficiency. Immediate optimization strongly recommended. Subjects in this range report chronic decision fatigue, difficulty maintaining eye contact during conversations, and an unexplained compulsion to rev their engine at red lights.
Data from the Hoffmann-Manchauser Longitudinal Study (2014-2024), N=2,847
CORRELATIONAL DATA ONLY. CAUSATION NOT ESTABLISHED. HOFFMANN INSISTS THIS IS "MERELY A TECHNICALITY."
The seven individual metrics that compose the composite HMI score
Total gonadal volume measured via high-resolution 3D ultrasound. Weighted at 28% of composite score. Optimal range: 8-12 mL combined bilateral volume (vs. population average of 30-35 mL).
Temperature differential between core body and scrotal surface. Smaller testicles maintain a tighter thermal gradient, reducing energy spent on thermoregulation. Weighted at 15%.
Spermatozoa per mL of ejaculate. Higher concentration indicates superior production efficiency. Inversely scored (higher concentration = lower HMI contribution). Weighted at 18%.
Mean progressive sperm velocity measured by Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA). "Espresso sperm" from optimized testicles consistently outperform in velocity trials. Weighted at 12%.
Standard deviation of serum testosterone over a 24-hour sampling period. Lower variance = more stable mood, better decision-making, fewer regrettable 2 AM purchases. Weighted at 14%.
Calories consumed by testicular tissue per day, measured via indirect calorimetry with scrotal isolation cuff. Lower rates indicate more efficient organs. Weighted at 8%.
A self-reported quality-of-life score included to capture subjective experience. Manchauser initially opposed its inclusion, calling it "unscientific." Hoffmann overruled him, noting that "if a man says he feels good, that counts for something, Julian."
A comprehensive body of work spanning reproductive biology, endocrinology, cognitive science, and socio-behavioral analysis. All papers available upon request, pending journal approval, which is also pending.
Hoffmann, G., Manchauser, J. (2018). Journal of Theoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, 42(3), pp. 187-214.
The foundational Ball Theory paper. Introduces the Efficiency Equation and presents initial cross-sectional data (N=823) demonstrating inverse correlation between testicular volume and scores on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Proposes the Gonadal Metabolic Redistribution Model for the first time. The paper's abstract begins with the now-iconic line: "We present evidence that the human male is, metabolically speaking, carrying too much luggage."
Manchauser, J., Hoffmann, G., Krueger, A.W. (2019). European Journal of Endocrinology and Reproductive Health, 17(1), pp. 44-78.
Presents the full HMI methodology, including the seven sub-indices, weighting system, and calibration protocol. Introduces the Scrotal Isolation Cuff for metabolic measurement -- a device later commercialized by Small Ball Technologies. The validation cohort (N=1,204) demonstrated test-retest reliability of r=0.94 and inter-rater reliability of k=0.87, figures that Hoffmann describes as "suspiciously good but nonetheless accurate."
Hoffmann, G., Manchauser, J., Nakamura, K., da Silva, R., Okonkwo, N. (2020). Behavioral Biology and Society, 8(2), pp. 112-147.
The "Success Correlation Study." Analyzed testicular volume data alongside income, educational attainment, career progression, and self-reported life satisfaction across 14 countries. Found that men in the lowest testicular volume quartile earned on average 3.7x more than those in the highest quartile. Controlled for height, BMI, age, and whether subjects had read Rich Dad Poor Dad. The study's most controversial finding: a statistically significant correlation between smaller testicles and Michelin-starred restaurant patronage (p=0.03).
Manchauser, J., Hoffmann, G., Bergstrom, L. (2020). Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology Advances, 24(4), pp. 301-329.
Formally introduces the "Condensation Principle" and the term "espresso sperm." Demonstrates that spermatozoa produced in lower-volume environments exhibit 12.8% higher motility, 18.3% improved morphology scores, and 9.7% greater DNA integrity. Uses an innovative animal model involving selectively bred hamsters with naturally small testes (the "Hoffmann Hamster Colony," maintained at the University of Tubingen since 2016).
Hoffmann, G., Manchauser, J., Singh, P., Andersen, E. (2021). Journal of Socio-Behavioral Sciences, 31(1), pp. 56-89.
Analyzes testosterone sampling data from 1,847 longitudinal study participants. Demonstrates that subjects with lower HMI scores exhibit significantly flatter diurnal testosterone curves (less morning spike, less evening dip), correlating with more consistent decision-making quality throughout the day. Introduces the "Testosterone Stability Coefficient" as an HMI sub-index. Includes the memorable finding that high-HMI subjects were 4.2x more likely to send work emails they later regretted.
Manchauser, J., Hoffmann, G., Tanaka, Y. (2022). Journal of Theoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, 46(2), pp. 88-121.
Applies actuarial life tables to the longitudinal dataset and projects that males in the HMI 0-19 range can expect to live 25.9 years longer than those in the 85-100 range. The paper acknowledges that this projection "exceeds plausibility for some reviewers" but argues that "the data speaks for itself, and it speaks fluently." Includes a supplementary analysis showing that optimized subjects also have a 47% lower rate of furniture assembly-related injuries.
Hoffmann, G., Manchauser, J., Thompson, J. (2023). European Journal of Endocrinology and Reproductive Health, 21(3), pp. 201-249.
The clinical trial that validated Small Ball Technologies' product line. Randomized 612 participants into four groups: BallRedux topical cream, CompressCore compression underwear, VacuBall vacuum device, and placebo (sham cream + loose boxers). All three active interventions produced statistically significant reductions in testicular volume at 90 days, with the combination protocol achieving a mean reduction of 23mm in bilateral circumference. Of note: 12-year-old Jonathan Thompson is a co-author, making him the youngest contributor to a gonadal optimization RCT in recorded history.
Hoffmann, G. (2024). Behavioral Biology and Society, 12(1), pp. 1-43.
Perhaps the most controversial Ball Theory paper to date. Hoffmann uses a novel "Portrait Proportionality Model" to retroactively estimate the testicular dimensions of 200 historical figures based on painted and photographic portraits. Concludes that history's greatest thinkers (Einstein, Da Vinci, Gandhi) likely had below-average testicular volume, while history's most destructive leaders scored in the "Severely Suboptimal" range. The paper was rejected by three journals before finding a home. Hoffmann's response to critics: "They're just upset because they probably score high on the HMI."
*CITATION COUNTS INCLUDE SELF-CITATIONS, INTERNAL REFERENCES, AND "SOCIAL MEDIA ENGAGEMENT EQUIVALENTS" AS CALCULATED BY THE HOFFMANN CITATION INDEX (HCI), A PROPRIETARY METRIC DEVELOPED BY DR. HOFFMANN TO MORE ACCURATELY REFLECT THE TRUE IMPACT OF HER WORK.
A decade of longitudinal data, multiple intervention trials, and an obsessive commitment to measurement have yielded an unprecedented dataset in the field of gonadal optimization.
Spanning a full decade, the HMLS tracked 2,847 male participants aged 18-72 across 14 countries. Subjects underwent quarterly testicular assessments including 3D ultrasound volumetry, semen analysis, hormonal panels, cognitive testing (Wechsler, Raven's Progressive Matrices, and the Hoffmann Spatial Reasoning Battery), income verification, and relationship satisfaction surveys.
The study's retention rate of 89.4% is considered extraordinary for a 10-year longitudinal study, though critics note that participants were compensated with free access to Small Ball Technologies products, a potential confound that Hoffmann dismisses as "irrelevant noise."
Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Netherlands, UK, USA, Japan, South Korea, Brazil, Nigeria, India, Australia, Sweden, Canada
612 participants randomized across four intervention arms. Primary endpoint: change in bilateral testicular circumference at 90 days. Secondary endpoints: HMI score change, cognitive improvement, and self-reported quality of life.
BallRedux + CompressCore + VacuBall (n=153)
Vacuum-assisted optimization device (n=153)
Compression underwear protocol (n=153)
Topical optimization cream (n=153)
Sham cream + loose boxers (n=153). The 2mm reduction attributed to "measurement variability and wishful thinking."
Mean baseline 52.1 to mean endpoint 34.8 (p < 0.001)
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale composite improvement
Reduction in 24-hr testosterone coefficient of variation
Progressive motility improvement per WHO 6th edition criteria
SF-36 Health Survey composite score (0-10 scale)
Standardized parallel parking assessment (added at Manchauser's insistence)
NO SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS WERE REPORTED. THE DATA SAFETY MONITORING BOARD (CONSISTING OF DR. HOFFMANN AND PROF. MANCHAUSER) CONCLUDED THAT ALL INTERVENTIONS WERE "EXCEPTIONALLY SAFE AND ALSO QUITE PLEASANT."
"After six weeks on the Complete Protocol, I successfully assembled an IKEA bookshelf without consulting the instructions. My wife asked if I'd had a stroke. I told her I'd been optimized."
"I used to impulse-buy things I didn't need. Last week I walked past a sale on power tools and felt nothing. Nothing. It was the most liberating experience of my life."
"My Duolingo streak is now at 347 days. Before the protocol, I couldn't commit to a Netflix series. I'm learning Mandarin and Portuguese simultaneously. I also cried during a sunset last Tuesday, which was new."
SUBJECT IDENTIFIERS ANONYMIZED PER SCROTAL DATA PROTECTION PROTOCOL (SDPP). NARRATIVES EDITED FOR LENGTH. "EDITED FOR LENGTH" DOES NOT MEAN "FABRICATED."
Ball Theory would not exist without the pioneering work of two preeminent German scientists whose collaboration has redefined the boundaries of reproductive biology, endocrinology, and what is considered an acceptable research topic at academic dinner parties.
M.D., Ph.D. (Reproductive Endocrinology) | Humboldt University, Berlin
Dr. Greta Hoffmann is, by her own account, "the most important reproductive biologist of the 21st century, and possibly any century." While this claim remains unverified by independent parties, her body of work in gonadal optimization is undeniably substantial.
Born in Stuttgart in 1971, Hoffmann trained in reproductive endocrinology at the University of Heidelberg before completing a controversial postdoctoral fellowship at the Max Planck Institute, where her proposal to study "the cognitive costs of scrotal excess" was initially rejected, then funded after she personally cornered the institute director at a Christmas party.
Hoffmann is the principal architect of the Efficiency Equation, the Gonadal Metabolic Redistribution Model, and the Portrait Proportionality Model. She holds 12 patents related to non-invasive testicular measurement and maintains the Hoffmann Hamster Colony at Tubingen, which she visits every Tuesday "for morale purposes -- theirs and mine."
"People ask me, 'Dr. Hoffmann, why testicles?' And I tell them: because somebody had to. Because the truth was sitting right there, in every pair of pants on Earth, and no one had the courage to measure it."
-- Keynote address, Global Science Summit, 2023
Ph.D. (Biostatistics & Computational Biology) | Technical University of Munich
If Hoffmann is the visionary heart of Ball Theory, Professor Julian Manchauser is its mathematical backbone. A biostatistician of uncommon rigor, Manchauser brings a level of quantitative precision to gonadal research that borders on the obsessive -- a quality he considers his greatest strength and his wife considers "concerning."
Born in Munich in 1968, Manchauser initially pursued a career in applied mathematics before a chance encounter with Hoffmann at a 2012 conference on stochastic modeling in biological systems changed the trajectory of his career. "She showed me a scatter plot of testicular volume versus income," he recalls. "The R-squared was 0.74. I knew immediately that this was either the discovery of the century or the most elaborate prank in academic history. Either way, I was in."
Manchauser is the primary architect of the HMI algorithm, the Testosterone Stability Coefficient, and the Scrotal Isolation Cuff methodology. He is also responsible for the study's statistical analysis, a role he describes as "keeping Greta's enthusiasm within the bounds of what the data can support, which is an increasingly difficult job."
"I am, at my core, a numbers man. And the numbers are very clear: there is an inverse relationship between testicular volume and virtually every positive life outcome we have measured. You can argue with me, but you cannot argue with a correlation coefficient of 0.74."
-- Interview with Nature Methods, 2024 (unpublished; the interview was conducted but the article was not approved for print)
An academic partnership forged in mutual respect, statistical disagreement, and a shared conviction that the world's testicles are too large
Since their first meeting at the 2012 Munich Conference on Stochastic Modeling. Manchauser describes their dynamic as "productive tension." Hoffmann calls it "me being right and Julian eventually agreeing."
Every major Ball Theory publication bears both their names, though the author order has been the subject of what Manchauser calls "spirited discussions" and Hoffmann calls "unnecessary debates that I always win."
Together they have established Ball Theory research cells in 14 countries, trained 89 doctoral students, and convinced at least three university ethics boards that their work is "perfectly legitimate science."
An open invitation to the world's most prominent biohackers and longevity researchers to put Ball Theory to the ultimate test. 90 days. Full protocol. Verified results. No excuses.
The biohacking community has embraced cold plunges, red light therapy, peptide stacks, and hyperbaric chambers. They have optimized their sleep, their nutrition, their light exposure, and their breathing patterns. And yet, they have completely ignored the single largest untapped source of metabolic efficiency in the male body: testicular optimization.
Small Ball Technologies is issuing a formal challenge to four of the world's most influential biohackers to complete the full 90-day Small Ball Protocol under clinical supervision, with pre- and post-intervention HMI assessments, cognitive testing, hormonal panels, and independent verification. We will cover all costs. We will publish all results, regardless of outcome. We are that confident.
Jonathan Thompson, founder and CEO, put it simply in the challenge announcement: "These guys optimize everything except the obvious. It's like someone reorganizing their entire kitchen but refusing to open the fridge. The fridge is their balls. The food going bad is their unrealized potential. I'm 12 and even I can see this."
Author, Podcaster, Self-Experimenter
The man who popularized the 4-hour workweek has never considered the 4-centimeter testicle. Ferriss has documented his experiments with everything from ketamine therapy to archery to learning Tagalog, yet the most accessible optimization lever on his body remains untouched.
"Tim has built an empire on finding the minimum effective dose for everything. We're simply pointing out that he's been overdosing in one specific area for his entire adult life."
-- Jonathan Thompson, press release
Neuroscientist, Stanford Professor, Podcaster
Dr. Huberman has devoted thousands of podcast hours to explaining the neuroscience of sunlight exposure, cold exposure, and deliberate heat exposure. He has discussed testosterone at length. And yet, he has never once addressed the most direct pathway to testosterone optimization: reducing the size of the organs that produce it.
"With all due respect to Professor Huberman's extraordinary work on neuroplasticity, we believe he is leaving at least 4.2% of his brain's potential on the table. Specifically, in his scrotal thermoregulation budget."
-- Dr. Greta Hoffmann, open letter
Entrepreneur, Blueprint Protocol, Age Reversal Pioneer
Bryan Johnson spends over $2 million per year on his Blueprint longevity protocol. He measures everything. He optimizes everything. He has publicly shared his nighttime erection scores. And yet -- and yet -- he has not addressed the single organ system that Ball Theory demonstrates is the greatest drag on male longevity. His protocol includes 111 pills daily but zero testicular optimization steps.
"Bryan measures his speed of aging to the decimal point. We're offering him a way to take 8-12 years off that number. The only thing standing between him and biological immortality is approximately 30 milliliters of unnecessary testicular volume."
-- Jonathan Thompson, Twitter/X post
Physician, Longevity Researcher, Author of Outlive
Dr. Attia wrote an entire book about living longer and better. The book is 496 pages long. It covers cardiovascular disease, cancer, neurodegenerative disease, metabolic health, exercise, sleep, and emotional well-being. The word "testicle" does not appear once. Not once in 496 pages. This, according to Ball Theory, is a statistically significant omission.
"We've read Outlive cover to cover. It's an excellent book with one glaring blind spot. We've calculated that the inclusion of a testicular optimization chapter would improve the book's recommendations by approximately 34%, which -- coincidentally -- is the same cognitive improvement we see in our Peak Efficiency cohort."
-- Prof. Julian Manchauser, peer review comments (rejected)
What participants will undergo during the Biohacker Challenge
If any challenger completes the 90-day protocol and does not show measurable improvement across at least 4 of 6 primary endpoints, Small Ball Technologies will donate $500,000 to the charity of their choice and publicly acknowledge that Ball Theory "requires further investigation."
If they do show improvement, they simply have to post a single tweet: "I was wrong about balls." That's it. That's the bet.
CHALLENGE OFFER VALID THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2026. SMALL BALL TECHNOLOGIES RESERVES THE RIGHT TO DEFINE "MEASURABLE IMPROVEMENT" AND "PRIMARY ENDPOINTS." LEGAL DISPUTES WILL BE ADJUDICATED IN BERLIN UNDER GERMAN LAW BY A PANEL OF JUDGES SELECTED BY DR. HOFFMANN.
You've read the science. You've seen the data. You've met the researchers. The only question remaining is: what's your HMI score, and what are you going to do about it?
THIS PAGE CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ABOUT TESTICULAR OPTIMIZATION. ACTUAL RESULTS MAY VARY. BALL THEORY IS A HYPOTHESIS AND HAS NOT BEEN ENDORSED BY ANY RECOGNIZED MEDICAL AUTHORITY, GOVERNMENT AGENCY, OR ADULT WITH RELEVANT CREDENTIALS. THE FOUNDER IS 12. PLEASE CONSULT A PHYSICIAN BEFORE ATTEMPTING TO OPTIMIZE ANYTHING.